C4 Versus 4C – Branding Too Close For Comfort?
My local BJ’s brochure advertised sales on these drink products:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b36c0/b36c09f2e3b4441f9c78017f30c16582a4e6ae15" alt=""
I did a double take – were these the same brand or owned by the same company? Very similar names and colors.
Turns out they are different products owned by different companies. I investigated the trademark status of these names and found that they both are registered trademarks:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a8a7/7a8a7cc6f45e00b850b2e44801e2bee2ff423e19" alt=""
Both offer very similar products in the drink category (C4 has a powdered drink mix). They are registered in different International Classes, but the similarity of the marks is what is important and from a trademark standpoint C4 and 4C would be considered to be very similar.
I’m not questioning the trademark office, but I am questioning the management of C4. When they filed, they had to be aware of 4C (check the registration dates above). Why would you launch a product with a nearly identical name/branding to a competitor?